@Randem

This is the kind of spam I’d like to get more of:

Subject: FW: WHO IS BARACK OBAMA?

There are many things people do not know about BARACK OBAMA. It is every American’s duty to read this message and pass it along to all of their friends and loved ones.

Barack Obama wears a FLAG PIN at all times. Even in the shower.

Barack Obama says the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE every time he sees an American flag. He also ends every sentence by saying, “WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.” Click here for video of Obama quietly mouthing the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE in his sleep.

A tape exists of Michelle Obama saying the PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE at a conference on PATRIOTISM.

Every weekend, Barack and Michelle take their daughters HUNTING.

Barack Obama is a PATRIOTIC AMERICAN. He has one HAND over his HEART at all times. He occasionally switches when one arm gets tired, which is almost never because he is STRONG.

Barack Obama has the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE tattooed on his stomach. It’s upside-down, so he can read it while doing sit-ups.

There’s only one artist on Barack Obama’s iPod: FRANCIS SCOTT KEY.

Barack Obama is a DEVOUT CHRISTIAN. His favorite book is the BIBLE, which he has memorized. His name means HE WHO LOVES JESUS in the ancient language of Aramaic. He is PROUD that Jesus was an American.

Barack Obama goes to church every morning. He goes to church every afternoon. He goes to church every evening. He is IN CHURCH RIGHT NOW.

Barack Obama’s new airplane includes a conference room, a kitchen, and a MEGACHURCH.

Barack Obama’s skin is the color of AMERICAN SOIL.

Barack Obama buys AMERICAN STUFF. He owns a FORD, a BASEBALL TEAM, and a COMPUTER HE BUILT HIMSELF FROM AMERICAN PARTS. He travels mostly by FORKLIFT.

Barack Obama says that Americans cling to GUNS and RELIGION because they are AWESOME.

John McCain’s tax return statement became public last Friday, and the details raise some interesting questions in my mind. Actually, it’s one detail in particular: McCain receives a 100-percent disability pension, amounting to almost $60,000 tax-free.

The first, most obvious question is this: Is a man who is 100% disabled fit to lead our country? If elected, McCain would be the oldest man ever to enter the Presidency. Shouldn’t that fact alone require an exceptional bill of health?

I would never belittle the heroism of a man who suffered the way he did in the service of our country. There should never be any question of my respect for who he has been, but while the way in which he acquired his disability is admirable, that shouldn’t make for exceptions for his physical ability to lead this nation.

Sure, it’s not as if you need to bench-press your body weight or run a six-minute mile in order to pick up red phones or shake the hands of diplomats. But with major disabilities come increased risks for other health problems. One has to assume that McCain’s choice of running-mate would have increased likeliness of being called to fill the role of President.

The next question this brings to mind is: What does this say about his financial policy? At the rate at which he was taxed, McCain would have had to pay an extra $18,000 on this income if this income were taxed.

This is the same guy whose campaign platform includes reforming the tax code; the same guy who said, “Americans do not resent paying their rightful share of taxes - what they do resent is being subjected to thousands of pages of needless and often irrational rules and demands from the IRS.”

Considering how anxious he is to cut everybody’s tax rates — even as our national debt reaches new, unimaginable heights — McCain openly exploits a “100% disability” loophole to save money and not pay taxes. What does that say about him? Apparently, Americans do not resent paying taxes, but he does.

Hillary Clinton may have won three of the big states last Tuesday, but it’s not states that count, it’s delgates. She continues to lag in delegates, and now it’s mathematically impossible for her to win the nomination by the agreed rules. Nevertheless she continues to keep the drama rolling.

So now we have Clinton and Obama clawing and scratching at each other while McCain sits pat. McCain now has the luxury of proactively winning more support while the Democratic contenders do all his dirty work for him. For the Democratic Party, this is a horrible strategic mistake.

This draws a nice parallel to another of history’s big rivalries: that between the Chicago Bears and the Green Bay Packers. Let me elaborate…

Just like two parties, both the Packers and the Bears are hoping to find the new leader. On one side you have the Packers who, like the Republicans, have picked out the person who they want to be the leader, and have begun to prepare him for the task. On the other hand you have the Bears who, like the Democrats, can’t commit to a leader, and the candidates for the role have to fight each other to win it.

The Packers will go into training camp committed to one guy — Aaron Rogers — and no matter what else has to be worked out for the team, the quarterback will spend his time preparing to lead his team and win games. Meanwhile, the Bears will spend the majority of their off-season distracted by multiple quarterbacks competing; whoever wins out will be underprepared, and he will be second-guessed all season.

So what’s my point? If the Democrats or the Bears want to have a chance of winning, they need to make a commitment to one person, stop the in-fighting, and start preparing to win because their opponents — the Republicans and the Packers — are already formulating their strategies to win.

I saw a clip on CNN while I was at lunch yesterday saying that President Dubya had vetoed a bill that would have given healthcare to 10 million poor children in America.

I really want to believe that there’s more to it. I want to believe that there was some pork in the bill that Bush was trying to prevent. I always doubt that anything is as cut-and-dried hateful as the media makes it out to be, so I can’t really imagine that he’s just some evil tryant who want to prevent poor kids from going to the hospital.

But then I read this:

Bush stated that “this legislation would move health care in this country in the wrong direction. Under this bill government coverage would displace private health insurance for many children.”

And it really was that clear to me. This douche-bag has spent his entire presidency looking out for the best interest of the healthcare industry (in his free time, when he wasn’t busy making new terrorist enemies) at the cost of actual health care for real people. He’s been fighting to protect the bottom line for a big industry rather than looking out for the good of the American people. And this is no different.

This bill was not vetoed because it was bad for Americans… it was vetoed because it might encourage some of the affected families to take the free government healthcare instead of paying for the overpriced insurance plans they have now. In other words, it would have actually been good for Americans, but at a cost to the evil corporate empire.

Not on his watch. No way.

I’ve been hearing a lot of criticism of AT&T lately.

$10 DSL
I heard the host of a radio program last Friday, talking about a deal that AT&T made with the FCC in order to get the okay on it’s BellSouth merger. One of the concessions is they have offer $10 DSL service.

The caller on the radio program related his experiences of calling the AT&T customer service line to get signed up for the program, whose rather strict criteria he meets. Every time he calls, however, he gets the runaround. The customer service representatives don’t seem to know of any such deal. The radio host insisted that AT&T is screwing with him and gave him a number for a federal bureau that investigates complaints of poor customer service.

DSL Trial Period
Later that evening, without any mention of AT&T, my brother begins to tell me the story of his debacle with the company.

His home phone service was provided by AT&T, as was his cable television. AT&T was also the provider for high-volume commercial phone and internet service at his place of business. When they ran a promotion late last year for a low-cost trial period with their DSL service, he decided to try that too.

For the duration of the trial period, the DSL never worked. He called periodically asking to have it canceled, but his complaints and request to cancel were me with argument from the customer service, insisting that it they could do some troubleshooting on their end and get it going. Their stonewalling tactic held him all the way through the end of the trial period, after which the service still did not work, but now they would happily disconnect him with no argument, if he pays the early-termination fee for the contract he is now implicitly locked into.

Worse, the early-termination fee is greater than the total that would be paid by simply paying by the terms of the contract to its completion. With this knowledge, he offered to simply pre-pay the entire amount of the contract, to completion, in exchange for having the service immediately disconnected, but they refused this.

In response to this horrible customer service, he has canceled his home phone service, changed cable tv providers, and moved his company’s voice and data services to a different provider. And now, my brother calls AT&T customer service every two weeks, just making sure to get someone on the line to guarantee him that, upon completion of the contract period, he can cancel his service without paying an early-termination fee.

New Terms of Service
The following morning, I saw a story on Boing Boing about new changes AT&T made to their terms of service, giving the company the right to terminate your connection for conduct that “tends to damage the name or reputation of AT&T, or its parents, affiliates and subsidiaries.” I suppose it’s a good thing I’m not an AT&T internet customer, or else I might end up losing my service for writing this!

News of the TOS changes stirred up a lot of unhappy responses. Several web sites that complained about the change were contacted by AT&T, and informed that while the TOS allows them to do it, they won’t be cutting the users off for vocalizing complaints. AT&T explains that the new terms are for people who look at child porn or advocate race violence. Sure.

What It Means To Me
While I’m not an AT&T internet customer, I do have AT&T cellular service, thanks to their merger with Cingular. And to be frank about it, I hate my service. I used to like it, but since the merger, the service has been awful. Apparently former AT&T subscribers feel the same way.

This is, ironically, how I ended up with Cingular cell service. I was a Sprint customer, and while I loved Sprint’s service, they never had any of the new, cool phones. When they merged with Nextel, their service got worse, and I switched to Cingular. Now, I find myself in the same situation and once again ready to switch.

My contract ends in a few months, and the only thing AT&T has left to make me want to remain a customer is that they are the exclusive provider of service for Apple’s iPhone. However, considering the release of the new iPod Touch, which is essentially, an iPhone without the phone, I can get everything but the phone features and never have to lock into a deal with any provider to make it work. Or, alternatively, I could try to get a hold of the iPhone SIM unlock hack that allows your iPhone to work with any SIM-based wireless provider, sacrificing only the interactive voicemail provided by AT&T.

Based on the way AT&T is running things, I think I’ll be better served by just getting an iPod Touch, while moving my phone service to Verizon, which seems to be the favorite now for value as well as service.

Incidentally, if you want to get out of a cellular contract, take a look at Celltrade, a service that helps you transfer your contract responsibility to
someone else and walk away without the hefty penalty.