Archive for August, 2006

The Reedy River

Thursday, August 3rd, 2006
The Reedy River at night
The Reedy River

It’s amazing how much light there really is in the dark. After leaving the shutter open for nearly 30 seconds, I was able to gather enough light to make this almost look like a daytime shot.

Once again, the presence of water makes this photo interesting. I’m starting to wonder if a career could be made shooting only photos that contain some form of moisture.

Quote of the day

Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006

“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.” -Albert Einstein

An anti-obesity vaccine?

Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006

This is the height of American laziness. We’ve got pharmaceutical scientists researching a way to “immunize” people against weight gain. You see, when the politically correct crowd refers to obesity as a disease, you start getting research to cure it. Jesus. Imagine that: rather than eating properly, and being active, you can just get your shot and keep eating like a pig.

The scientists have isolated a chemical called ghrelin, which regulates appetite and energy metabolism. And now, they have engineered a way to trick the immune system into attacking ghrelin, thus preventing it from causing your body to store energy in fat cells.

Mice injected with the vaccine ate just as much as untreated mice but had about a 20 or 30 percent reduction in weight gain. However, the mice were fed low-fat, low-energy diets. It’s not certain that a ghrelin vaccine would be effective against the burger-rich, high-fat diet that many Americans eat, the researchers noted.

Notice the disclaimer given there. It is widely accepted that people are obese because of their diet. Obesity is not a disease. Is it really smart to treat it like one? Once you’ve tricked your immune system into thinking ghrelin is a foreign body, will it stop when you stop using the vaccine? Or will anyone even bother to stop?

Attention MySpacers…

Tuesday, August 1st, 2006

The US House of Representatives just passed the Deleting Online Predators Act by a vote of 410 to 15, which just goes to show how little congressmen really know about the Internet. The new law would forbid minors in any publicly funded institution (schools, libraries, etc) from accessing any web site with a social networking element to it. OUT-LAW.com has this to say about the DOPA.

The law suggests that the FCC consider as social networking sites any site that allows users to edit a profile, chat to users or post personal data.

Under that loose definition a very large number of sites would qualify, including Amazon.com, which allows users to post lists of preferences and create profiles of authors, Ebay, in which each user has a profile which changes as they shop, or any number of major news sites, where users can discuss stories online.

And I agree. Not that I think kids should be using eBay from school… but there are plenty of legitimate web sites online, such as news sites or learning sites, that would be banned. For example, it seems to me that Wikipedia would qualify as having a social networking element.

It’s shameful that Congress would vote in such a poorly worded, open-ended law without any resistance. You see, since it will be up to the FCC to determine what web sites are offensive, this essentially puts an information weapon into the hands of our government allowing them to censor certain information from a child’s education. I hate to imagine such a tool could be wielded in the deceptive hands of a snake like Karl Rove, Donald Rumsfeld, or King George II.

Now look. I really don’t see any good reason for kids to be using MySpace at school. But there’s just no reason why our government should be allowed to stop them from using it at the library. For every kid who encounters a stalker there are thousands who have no problems. You don’t punish the kids for the mistakes of the occasional pervert.